Shields Meneley Logo

  • Home
  • About Us
    • The Team
    • Advisory Board
    • Testimonials
  • Organizations
    • Executive Transition
      • Executive Transition Process
      • Exiting a Seasoned Executive
      • Benefit to Organizations
      • Life Planning Package
    • Executive Coaching and Development
      • Improving Individual Performance
      • Improving Team Performance
      • On Boarding
      • Succession Planning
    • Executive Assessment
      • Recruiting and Succession
      • Managing CEO Succession
      • Private Equity Recruiting
  • Individuals
    • Exiting Now
      • Our Process
      • Looking For A New Role
      • Changing Careers
    • Confidential Transition
      • Our Confidential Process
      • Exploring Options
    • Next Chapter
      • Living A Portfolio Life
      • Becoming an Entrepreneur
      • Life Planning
      • Board Development
  • In The Media
  • Contact Us
  • Client Intranet
  • Executive Review
Contact Us

Get in touch with us if you have any queries and we will get back to you as soon as possible.




    HOW DID YOU HEAR ABOUT US?

    Shields Meneley Partners
    • Home
    • About Us
      • The Team
      • Advisory Board
      • Testimonials
    • Organizations
      • Executive Transition
        • Executive Transition Process
        • Exiting a Seasoned Executive
        • Benefit to Organizations
        • Life Planning Package
      • Executive Coaching and Development
        • Improving Individual Performance
        • Improving Team Performance
        • On Boarding
        • Succession Planning
      • Executive Assessment
        • Recruiting and Succession
        • Managing CEO Succession
        • Private Equity Recruiting
    • Individuals
      • Exiting Now
        • Our Process
        • Looking For A New Role
        • Changing Careers
      • Confidential Transition
        • Our Confidential Process
        • Exploring Options
      • Next Chapter
        • Living A Portfolio Life
        • Becoming an Entrepreneur
        • Life Planning
        • Board Development
    • In The Media
    • Contact Us
    • Client Intranet
    • Executive Review

    Talent Culture

    • Home
    • >

    Archives

    • February 2022
    • August 2021
    • May 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • January 2017
    • November 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • June 2012
    • April 2012
    • August 2010
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009

    Meta

    • Log in
    23 Nov

    Here’s Why Today’s Leaders Should Choose “And” Thinking

    By admin In Career Transition, Future of work, HR, Leadership, Talent Development /   No Comments

    HR Strategy, Work Culture by Elizabeth K. Olson
    To the detriment of talent development and work cultures everywhere, we most often employ “either/or” thinking. Let’s talk about why today’s leaders should more often choose “and” thinking….

    So many important aspects of human capital are nuanced and interrelated, yet seemingly polar opposites. For instance, recognizing the individual performer or recognizing team efforts. Showing respect for each person or showing respect based on performance and rewarding managerial-style performance or rewarding leaders.

    Some organizations state only half of these pairs as desired values, hence the “or” between them. This is a mistake because when we see these values framed as either/or choices, we miss the synergy from leveraging the best from both sides. We cause harm from overfocusing on one value to the neglect of the other. After all, many values are interdependent, and ideas we think might be opposites are both highly desirable. The misleading part about this is that they need to live in tension with one another over time. These pairings can be called paradoxes, wicked problems, or polarities that require “and thinking.”

    “And” Thinking Versus “Or” Thinking

    Both inside and outside of work, complexities exist that require us to think about these tensions between seemingly opposing pairs, rather than choosing A over B. For instance, one critical thinking point for leaders is the push-pull between continuity and transformation.

    Those business leaders often find themselves executing complex change initiatives that enable their companies to compete better. At the same time, they must create and maintain consistent foundational cultures employees can lean into – no matter what. All too often, when the message is only why complex changes are necessary, without acknowledging what has been going well (and what needs to remain in place), even the best plans blow up.

    Everything done “the old way” is now wrong. Right?

    This pervasive contradiction lowers morale and confuses, thereby sabotaging the energy and focus needed to implement the change.

    Centralized Versus Decentralized Coordination

    One of the biggest derailers for employees is the pendulum swing between centralized coordination and decentralized coordination. Organizations are frequently in a seesaw around this polarity. It’s as if one is better than the other, so they over-focus on one at the expense of the other.

    For instance, a new chief executive officer is instituted and says: “We’ve lost the entrepreneurial nature of this organization, and we must decentralize and give control to each of the business units.” Because centralization and decentralization are interrelated, people complain there is no coordination and little ability to share services effectively. That causes the next CEO to say: “We have to centralize; everything is all over the map. Nobody knows who’s on first.” After finally getting used to the new structure, it whipsaws back to some version of the old one. With the average tenure of CEOs being three-and-a-half years, organizations must simultaneously focus on centralization and decentralization.

    The Solution: Mapping Versus Gapping

    One way around this conundrum is to institute a mapping process…

    Instead of executing a gap analysis, which is how most people approach change, we think about the upside and downside of their preferred value or pole in the polarity equation. We then do the same for the countervailing pole. Then, as the diagram illustrates, we outline action steps for gaining the upsides from each pole. We also design strategies for avoiding the downsides of each if we over-focus on one pole to neglect the other.

    That is “and” thinking.

    Once we get the tension right between the different energetic poles, my clients find themselves comfortably resting in a virtuous cycle. They begin to get the best of both options, no matter how opposite those options seem. For many leaders, this comes as such a relief. Because those leaders, rather than focusing on the power of both – the “and” – tend to over-focus on one side of the equation. They then find themselves in a vicious and contentious cycle that isn’t good for them, their fellow leaders, or their teams.

    Harness the power of both poles. Expand your thinking to “and.” You’ll soon create a virtuous cycle that will enable your organization to thrive, freeing your teams to unify under healthy “and” tensions versus the opposing camps that can form from “or” decisions.

    Link(s) to Article:
    https://talentculture.com/and-thinking/

    Read More

    Posts navigation

    Our Advisors are your peers. All have held top executive roles with significant operational and P&L responsibility.

    Like you, they know the challenges, opportunities, and rewards unique to serving in the C-suite or the Boardroom. Our administrative support staff have considerable experience to help our clients during their career transition, coaching experience or assessment process.

    Quick Links

    • Home
    • About Us
    • Organizations
    • Our Blog
    • Contact Us
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy

    Services

    • Organizations
      • Executive Transition
      • Executive Coaching and Development
      • Executive Assessment
    • Individuals
      • Exiting Now
      • Confidential Transition
      • Next Chapter

    Latest Post

    • linkedin_post
      It is Never Too Early to Get a Coach February 11, 2022
    • linkedin_post
      Gratitude Has No Statute of Limitations August 11, 2021
    • linkedin_post
      Company Identity May 14, 2021
    • 3 Steps to Build a More Inclusive Team While Working Remotely March 11, 2021
    • corporate-board-member
      Corporate Board Member Magazine Features Guest Article by Gail Meneley February 27, 2021
    © 2021 Shields Meneley Partners. All rights reserved.

    Are you sure you want to logout from Shields Meneley?

    Lost your password?

    X
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • LinkedIn
    • Whatsapp